for those who dared to dream
Monday, December 22, 2014
eigrp offset
R1
=====
show ip proto --->output
Routing Protocol is "eigrp 10"
Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not set
Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not set
Default networks flagged in outgoing updates
Default networks accepted from incoming updates
EIGRP metric weight K1=1, K2=0, K3=1, K4=0, K5=0
EIGRP maximum hopcount 100
EIGRP maximum metric variance 1
Redistributing: connected, eigrp 10
EIGRP NSF-aware route hold timer is 240s
Automatic network summarization is not in effect
Maximum path: 4
Routing for Networks:
10.10.10.0/24
10.10.20.0/24
Routing Information Sources:
Gateway Distance Last Update
10.10.10.2 90 00:03:00
10.10.20.2 90 00:03:00
Distance: internal 90 external 170
Show IP route output
Gateway of last resort is not set
1.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 1.1.1.0 is directly connected, Loopback1
10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
C 10.10.10.0 is directly connected, Serial1/0
C 10.10.20.0 is directly connected, Serial1/1
D 192.168.1.0/24 [90/2172416] via 10.10.20.2, 00:13:15, Serial1/1
[90/2172416] via 10.10.10.2, 00:13:15, Serial1/0
after offset
=====
show ip proto --->output
Routing Protocol is "eigrp 10"
Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not set
Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not set
Default networks flagged in outgoing updates
Default networks accepted from incoming updates
EIGRP metric weight K1=1, K2=0, K3=1, K4=0, K5=0
EIGRP maximum hopcount 100
EIGRP maximum metric variance 1
Redistributing: connected, eigrp 10
EIGRP NSF-aware route hold timer is 240s
Automatic network summarization is not in effect
Maximum path: 4
Routing for Networks:
10.10.10.0/24
10.10.20.0/24
Routing Information Sources:
Gateway Distance Last Update
10.10.10.2 90 00:03:00
10.10.20.2 90 00:03:00
Distance: internal 90 external 170
Show IP route output
Gateway of last resort is not set
1.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 1.1.1.0 is directly connected, Loopback1
10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
C 10.10.10.0 is directly connected, Serial1/0
C 10.10.20.0 is directly connected, Serial1/1
D 192.168.1.0/24 [90/2172416] via 10.10.20.2, 00:13:15, Serial1/1
[90/2172416] via 10.10.10.2, 00:13:15, Serial1/0
after offset
successor and feasible successor
I know that only successor routes appear in the routing table, but how can I tell the difference between successor and feasible successor?
R1# show ip eigrp topology
IP-EIGRP Topology Table for AS(1)/ID(172.31.16.1)
Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply,
r - reply Status, s - sia Status
P 172.31.151.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 768
via Connected, Loopback1
P 172.31.211.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 1024
via 172.31.11.201 (1024/76, FastEthernet0/0
P 172.31.24.0/30, 1 successors, FD is 768
via 172.31.11.2 (768/512), FastEthernet0/0
via 172.31.14.2 (1024/512), Serial0/0.4
======================================
P 172.31.24.0/30, 1 successors, FD is 768
via 172.31.11.2 (FD768/AD512), FastEthernet0/0
via 172.31.14.2 (FD1024/AD512), Serial0/0.4
R1# show ip eigrp topology
IP-EIGRP Topology Table for AS(1)/ID(172.31.16.1)
Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply,
r - reply Status, s - sia Status
P 172.31.151.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 768
via Connected, Loopback1
P 172.31.211.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 1024
via 172.31.11.201 (1024/76, FastEthernet0/0
P 172.31.24.0/30, 1 successors, FD is 768
via 172.31.11.2 (768/512), FastEthernet0/0
via 172.31.14.2 (1024/512), Serial0/0.4
======================================
P 172.31.24.0/30, 1 successors, FD is 768
via 172.31.11.2 (FD768/AD512), FastEthernet0/0
via 172.31.14.2 (FD1024/AD512), Serial0/0.4
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)